<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nick Hodges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges</link>
	<description>The Blog of the Delphi Product Manager</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Pete Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27142</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27142</guid>
		<description>I kept the report - this is all Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor says:

Embarcadero RAD Studio 2010 - Embarcadero - Known issues - You may experience issues running this program on Windows 7.

"Known issues"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept the report - this is all Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor says:</p>
<p>Embarcadero RAD Studio 2010 - Embarcadero - Known issues - You may experience issues running this program on Windows 7.</p>
<p>"Known issues"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Bruce McGee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27110</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27110</guid>
		<description>@Pete,
Does Windows 7 give details on what these issues are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pete,<br />
Does Windows 7 give details on what these issues are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Pete Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27077</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27077</guid>
		<description>If Rad Studio 2010 is the tool for Windows 7 why does the Windows 7 compatible tool advise me that Delphi 2010 "has issues"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Rad Studio 2010 is the tool for Windows 7 why does the Windows 7 compatible tool advise me that Delphi 2010 "has issues"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Lee Grissom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27076</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Grissom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27076</guid>
		<description>Regarding RC1.  Consider this:  Hardware products and movie producers seem to follow the rule of "omit the number 1".  For example, "Rush Hour 1" would have come across weird.  "BlackBerry Storm 1" would also be equally weird, even though there is now a Storm2 model out.  Keep it simple, go ahead and omit the 1, even if you know for certain you're going to have RC2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding RC1.  Consider this:  Hardware products and movie producers seem to follow the rule of "omit the number 1".  For example, "Rush Hour 1" would have come across weird.  "BlackBerry Storm 1" would also be equally weird, even though there is now a Storm2 model out.  Keep it simple, go ahead and omit the 1, even if you know for certain you&#8217;re going to have RC2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Pratt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27073</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27073</guid>
		<description>There has already been RC2005, RC2006, RC2007, RC2009 and RC2010 so wouldnt RC1 confuse current users ?

I'm sure that Help Update is needed but F1 not working in OI should have been fixed weeks ago !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has already been RC2005, RC2006, RC2007, RC2009 and RC2010 so wouldnt RC1 confuse current users ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that Help Update is needed but F1 not working in OI should have been fixed weeks ago !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by JB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27072</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27072</guid>
		<description>Ken - try another browser. I have the same problem in IE7. Firefox works much better for me. It's a pretty cool showcase when it works. Hopefully somebody who can fix this is paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken - try another browser. I have the same problem in IE7. Firefox works much better for me. It&#8217;s a pretty cool showcase when it works. Hopefully somebody who can fix this is paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Ken Knopfli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Knopfli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27065</guid>
		<description>Only 4 applications so far. 

Information on what they are and what they do would have been nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 4 applications so far. </p>
<p>Information on what they are and what they do would have been nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Pete Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27062</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27062</guid>
		<description>Even with Help Update 1 dexplore.exe still hangs around, causing my system to hang on reboot/shutdown. The saga of broken help with Delphi still continues from 2005. Is it really taking you guys over four years to fix a problem with the documentation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with Help Update 1 dexplore.exe still hangs around, causing my system to hang on reboot/shutdown. The saga of broken help with Delphi still continues from 2005. Is it really taking you guys over four years to fix a problem with the documentation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Dimitrij Kowalski</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27058</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitrij Kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27058</guid>
		<description>Nick: this link doesn't work:

http://staging.embarcadero.com/images/dm/RAD-2010-upgrade-FAQs.pdf

This is link under "More information" at the bottom of window which is offering an upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick: this link doesn&#8217;t work:</p>
<p><a href="http://staging.embarcadero.com/images/dm/RAD-2010-upgrade-FAQs.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://staging.embarcadero.com/images/dm/RAD-2010-upgrade-FAQs.pdf</a></p>
<p>This is link under "More information" at the bottom of window which is offering an upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by ra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27057</link>
		<dc:creator>ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27057</guid>
		<description>IANAL and this is for entertainment purposes only.

Craig:  It is doubly funny because the *very next one* after that says "See below for details and restrictions."

Not so funny story: I used an LGPLv2 library that granted special exception to allow closed-source apps to statically link to the library without distributing the resulting software with LGPL license.  After months of effort, the LGPL library had to be replaced.  Why?  Because during due-diligence, it was determined that the non-LGPL license for the resulting software (as allowed by LGPL) is required to allow reverse engineering, among other things as a condition of allowing non-LGPL license. A "license engineer" from fsf.org also confirmed this awful finding.  See for yourself by reading LGPLv2.

Until that incident, I assumed it was safe to use LGPL in closed source software. And I assumed it was doubly safe if the LGPL library had a special exception for closed source software.  I was wrong and the experience wasn't fun.

Do popular Delphi libraries like JCL, JVCL etc. include any LGPL or GPL code?  Does any GPL or LGPL code get static-linked into your binaries?  What does that mean for your closed-source software and your commercial EULA?  Ask fsf.org or your own IP lawyer, because their opinions matter more than ours regarding these matters.  

Imagine how funny it would be if a qualified intellectual property lawyer told you that your software must allow your end users to reverse-engineer and modify their copies of your binaries for personal use. Then imagine if you had already allowed thousands of end users to download a shareware version.  ROFL. 

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IANAL and this is for entertainment purposes only.</p>
<p>Craig:  It is doubly funny because the *very next one* after that says "See below for details and restrictions."</p>
<p>Not so funny story: I used an LGPLv2 library that granted special exception to allow closed-source apps to statically link to the library without distributing the resulting software with LGPL license.  After months of effort, the LGPL library had to be replaced.  Why?  Because during due-diligence, it was determined that the non-LGPL license for the resulting software (as allowed by LGPL) is required to allow reverse engineering, among other things as a condition of allowing non-LGPL license. A "license engineer" from fsf.org also confirmed this awful finding.  See for yourself by reading LGPLv2.</p>
<p>Until that incident, I assumed it was safe to use LGPL in closed source software. And I assumed it was doubly safe if the LGPL library had a special exception for closed source software.  I was wrong and the experience wasn&#8217;t fun.</p>
<p>Do popular Delphi libraries like JCL, JVCL etc. include any LGPL or GPL code?  Does any GPL or LGPL code get static-linked into your binaries?  What does that mean for your closed-source software and your commercial EULA?  Ask fsf.org or your own IP lawyer, because their opinions matter more than ours regarding these matters.  </p>
<p>Imagine how funny it would be if a qualified intellectual property lawyer told you that your software must allow your end users to reverse-engineer and modify their copies of your binaries for personal use. Then imagine if you had already allowed thousands of end users to download a shareware version.  ROFL. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Craig Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27054</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27054</guid>
		<description>ra:  Funny how you could read that line of the UPX license and miss the *very next one*, which says "As a special exception we grant the free usage of UPX for all executables, including commercial programs."  You can use UPX on commercial, closed-source applications, so long as you're using an unmodified UPX release, which means it's completely compatible with 99% of commercial software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ra:  Funny how you could read that line of the UPX license and miss the *very next one*, which says "As a special exception we grant the free usage of UPX for all executables, including commercial programs."  You can use UPX on commercial, closed-source applications, so long as you&#8217;re using an unmodified UPX release, which means it&#8217;s completely compatible with 99% of commercial software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by ra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27053</link>
		<dc:creator>ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27053</guid>
		<description>I finally tried Rad Studio 2010 and my high expectations were exceeded.  A bunch of little things really add up. The IDE Insight and improved Find already made me hate using older version of Delphi.

I heard that executables might be larger than Delphi 2009, so I use PECompact (by Bitsum Technologies) which sometimes compresses a 6MB .exe to only 2MB.

Yes, I know UPX is a free executable compressor, but UPX is GPL and says "The terms of the GNU General Public License still apply as compressing a program is a special form of linking with our stub." -- which means you have to allow reverse engineering and binary modifications for personal use among other things (not compatible with 99% of commercial software EULA).

So all in all, there's no practical disadvantage by upgrading from Rad Studio 2009 to 2010.  Highly recommended because it increases productivity.  Isn't improved productivity one of the biggest reasons we use Delphi instead of Microsoft Visual C++?

The improved help is nice, but what we need are updated editions of books like Delphi in a Nutshell and many more.  In the meantime, I'm waiting for Marco Cantu's Delphi 2010 Handbook and hope they are as good as his 2007 and 2009 editions.

DISCLAIMERS: I'm not affiliated with Bitsum. I'm just a happy customer having switched from ASProtect to UPX and finally to PECompact (most reliable so far).  I'm also not affiliated with Embarcadero.  I'm just a happy customer of Rad Studio &#38; Rapid SQL (I just wish I wasn't compelled to use Microsoft C++ for creating DLLs that need to load into 64-bit apps).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally tried Rad Studio 2010 and my high expectations were exceeded.  A bunch of little things really add up. The IDE Insight and improved Find already made me hate using older version of Delphi.</p>
<p>I heard that executables might be larger than Delphi 2009, so I use PECompact (by Bitsum Technologies) which sometimes compresses a 6MB .exe to only 2MB.</p>
<p>Yes, I know UPX is a free executable compressor, but UPX is GPL and says "The terms of the GNU General Public License still apply as compressing a program is a special form of linking with our stub." &#8212; which means you have to allow reverse engineering and binary modifications for personal use among other things (not compatible with 99% of commercial software EULA).</p>
<p>So all in all, there&#8217;s no practical disadvantage by upgrading from Rad Studio 2009 to 2010.  Highly recommended because it increases productivity.  Isn&#8217;t improved productivity one of the biggest reasons we use Delphi instead of Microsoft Visual C++?</p>
<p>The improved help is nice, but what we need are updated editions of books like Delphi in a Nutshell and many more.  In the meantime, I&#8217;m waiting for Marco Cantu&#8217;s Delphi 2010 Handbook and hope they are as good as his 2007 and 2009 editions.</p>
<p>DISCLAIMERS: I&#8217;m not affiliated with Bitsum. I&#8217;m just a happy customer having switched from ASProtect to UPX and finally to PECompact (most reliable so far).  I&#8217;m also not affiliated with Embarcadero.  I&#8217;m just a happy customer of Rad Studio &amp; Rapid SQL (I just wish I wasn&#8217;t compelled to use Microsoft C++ for creating DLLs that need to load into 64-bit apps).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Delphi Survey by Viðarr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-27052</link>
		<dc:creator>Viðarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-27052</guid>
		<description>To continue #29:

The Standard edition doesn't fulfill my needs either, because the VCL sources are missing. Don't know about the command line compiler, but that is another important feature for me.

Oh, and since we upgraded to RAD Studio 2009 (at work) I also want to comment on the very unsatisfying update wizard (InstallAware?). It's not transparent to me as the user where the files land (need to actually search them) and it's not obvious how to use them (without downloading them again without the wizard) after re-installing RAD Studio. E.g. on the same machine after restoring a backup of the system disk which didn't contain RAD Studio in the first place ...

The Unicode transition was nice, but it's a shame Unicode is now the *only* option, instead of making it a preprocessor decision (as in MS' C/C++). Oh yeah ... were is that preprocessor anyways? :)

Oh well, no reason to rant any further, for my private use BDS 2006 was the last one and it's going to stay that way unless the maintenance and pricing policy changes a lot (and unnecessary stuff doesn't have to be paid dearly). I want Delphi 5/6 and its quality and speed back ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To continue #29:</p>
<p>The Standard edition doesn&#8217;t fulfill my needs either, because the VCL sources are missing. Don&#8217;t know about the command line compiler, but that is another important feature for me.</p>
<p>Oh, and since we upgraded to RAD Studio 2009 (at work) I also want to comment on the very unsatisfying update wizard (InstallAware?). It&#8217;s not transparent to me as the user where the files land (need to actually search them) and it&#8217;s not obvious how to use them (without downloading them again without the wizard) after re-installing RAD Studio. E.g. on the same machine after restoring a backup of the system disk which didn&#8217;t contain RAD Studio in the first place &#8230;</p>
<p>The Unicode transition was nice, but it&#8217;s a shame Unicode is now the *only* option, instead of making it a preprocessor decision (as in MS&#8217; C/C++). Oh yeah &#8230; were is that preprocessor anyways? <img src='http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Oh well, no reason to rant any further, for my private use BDS 2006 was the last one and it&#8217;s going to stay that way unless the maintenance and pricing policy changes a lot (and unnecessary stuff doesn&#8217;t have to be paid dearly). I want Delphi 5/6 and its quality and speed back &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Delphi Survey by Viðarr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-27051</link>
		<dc:creator>Viðarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-27051</guid>
		<description>I also ran into the problem with the same page loading again. There was an error message indeed, but not highlighted or obvious at all. It took me four times until I actually got to the next page.

Strangely enough none of the questions touches the topic of maintenance of current products. And the past records of Borland/Inprise/Borland/CodeGear/Embarcadero w.r.t. Delphi/BCB aren't very convincing. It has become a normal method to simply abandon X-1 and X-2 (and all X-n with n &#62; 2) if X is the current product version. Sometimes you even get that feeling for X itself. For that price and with that kind of maintenance policy I don't even think about upgrading anymore.

Just look at the competition and think again. Apart from that in Delphi I don't need all the fancy DB-related stuff, SOAP and "web application" stuff. There are (IMO) other and better tools for these purposes. However, with the Pro version I always get these by default and *pay* for them and even worse have the (disk/memory-wise) overhead of them.

Oh and this text field is TOO SHORT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also ran into the problem with the same page loading again. There was an error message indeed, but not highlighted or obvious at all. It took me four times until I actually got to the next page.</p>
<p>Strangely enough none of the questions touches the topic of maintenance of current products. And the past records of Borland/Inprise/Borland/CodeGear/Embarcadero w.r.t. Delphi/BCB aren&#8217;t very convincing. It has become a normal method to simply abandon X-1 and X-2 (and all X-n with n &gt; 2) if X is the current product version. Sometimes you even get that feeling for X itself. For that price and with that kind of maintenance policy I don&#8217;t even think about upgrading anymore.</p>
<p>Just look at the competition and think again. Apart from that in Delphi I don&#8217;t need all the fancy DB-related stuff, SOAP and "web application" stuff. There are (IMO) other and better tools for these purposes. However, with the Pro version I always get these by default and *pay* for them and even worse have the (disk/memory-wise) overhead of them.</p>
<p>Oh and this text field is TOO SHORT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by TDelphiHobbyist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27050</link>
		<dc:creator>TDelphiHobbyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27050</guid>
		<description>Hiya Nick,
Having only jumped in and upgraded yesterday, including Help Update #1 I'm not really in a position to pass out kudos -but- having had a quick glance at it - it looks promising. Having abandoned Help several versions ago I'm really going to have a good look at what you've done with it for D2010.
I think the UG deal you're offering those that have been sitting on dusty old dog-eared versions is a great deal for them. Hopefully many will take advantage of it - it'll be a very smart move for them. I disagree with giving them the latest and greatest just so they can sit on that for 10+ years though. If you like/use the product, not investing in the company [at upgrade rates] seems kind of foolhardy to me. If you're giving stuff away, give it to those that support the product/company regularly.
The showcase page is really well done - congrats to the team who designed/built it.
My $0.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Nick,<br />
Having only jumped in and upgraded yesterday, including Help Update #1 I&#8217;m not really in a position to pass out kudos -but- having had a quick glance at it - it looks promising. Having abandoned Help several versions ago I&#8217;m really going to have a good look at what you&#8217;ve done with it for D2010.<br />
I think the UG deal you&#8217;re offering those that have been sitting on dusty old dog-eared versions is a great deal for them. Hopefully many will take advantage of it - it&#8217;ll be a very smart move for them. I disagree with giving them the latest and greatest just so they can sit on that for 10+ years though. If you like/use the product, not investing in the company [at upgrade rates] seems kind of foolhardy to me. If you&#8217;re giving stuff away, give it to those that support the product/company regularly.<br />
The showcase page is really well done - congrats to the team who designed/built it.<br />
My $0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Jolyon Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27049</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolyon Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27049</guid>
		<description>Here's an idea... instead of hanging a threat of loss of upgrade rights over people's heads to try to compel them to upgrade to a version that - right or wrong - they feel they don't need or have a fear of, why not offer them something they are far more likely to be able to use...

i.e. instead of "Upgrade in the next 2 months or we'll consider you a new user"... offer:  "Upgrade to Delphi 2010 and get the same edition (Pro/Ent/Arch) of Delphi 2007 FREE"

I bet you'll get a better response and a lot happier customers as a result.

As it is I imagine many people on 2005 and earlier will instead be thinking "Well, that's it then... definitely time to switch to Visual Studio if THIS is how we're going to be treated in future by Emborcaderoprise"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an idea&#8230; instead of hanging a threat of loss of upgrade rights over people&#8217;s heads to try to compel them to upgrade to a version that - right or wrong - they feel they don&#8217;t need or have a fear of, why not offer them something they are far more likely to be able to use&#8230;</p>
<p>i.e. instead of "Upgrade in the next 2 months or we&#8217;ll consider you a new user"&#8230; offer:  "Upgrade to Delphi 2010 and get the same edition (Pro/Ent/Arch) of Delphi 2007 FREE"</p>
<p>I bet you&#8217;ll get a better response and a lot happier customers as a result.</p>
<p>As it is I imagine many people on 2005 and earlier will instead be thinking "Well, that&#8217;s it then&#8230; definitely time to switch to Visual Studio if THIS is how we&#8217;re going to be treated in future by Emborcaderoprise"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Craig Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27048</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27048</guid>
		<description>Hmm, the release candidate question is a good one.  I think "Release Candiate 1" is a valid name for a release candidate.  You're just protecting against confusion if an RC2 needs to be released.  On the flip side, it does feel like that gives it a bit less mental weight, like you're planning on the second one.  I was planning on naming the next Abbrevia release RC1, but now you have me second guessing myself. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the release candidate question is a good one.  I think "Release Candiate 1" is a valid name for a release candidate.  You&#8217;re just protecting against confusion if an RC2 needs to be released.  On the flip side, it does feel like that gives it a bit less mental weight, like you&#8217;re planning on the second one.  I was planning on naming the next Abbrevia release RC1, but now you have me second guessing myself. <img src='http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by JB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27046</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27046</guid>
		<description>Hmm, the bar at the top where i suppose the left and right arrows are supposed to show up just goes black when the page has loaded. Using IE 7. I can't do or click on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the bar at the top where i suppose the left and right arrows are supposed to show up just goes black when the page has loaded. Using IE 7. I can&#8217;t do or click on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Rick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27043</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27043</guid>
		<description>Love it!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27045</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27045</guid>
		<description>and, where is the showcase for c++builder???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and, where is the showcase for c++builder???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27044</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27044</guid>
		<description>the website link of finalbuilder is the same as ibp, are you sure ?

and the navigate panel is not so smooth in my firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the website link of finalbuilder is the same as ibp, are you sure ?</p>
<p>and the navigate panel is not so smooth in my firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by Bruce McGee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27042</guid>
		<description>JB,

Click the arrows to the left and right.  The applications will scroll 4 at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB,</p>
<p>Click the arrows to the left and right.  The applications will scroll 4 at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene #134 by JB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27041</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/11/02/39331#comment-27041</guid>
		<description>i don't think the showcase is working. all i see is (briefly) 4 apps at the top, then after waiting for the page to load, a pretty picture of some warped screenshots and a marketing blurb appear instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think the showcase is working. all i see is (briefly) 4 apps at the top, then after waiting for the page to load, a pretty picture of some warped screenshots and a marketing blurb appear instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Delphi Survey by Dimitrij Kowalski</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-27029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitrij Kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-27029</guid>
		<description>I've completed the survey.
However I am quite surprised that there is no "human - check" for it.
Results can be easly affected by some bot...
For example: if I need badly 64 bit I order to my bot to create 1000 surveys for 64 bit option.
Or even better, I make 5000 votes for garbage collection ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve completed the survey.<br />
However I am quite surprised that there is no "human - check" for it.<br />
Results can be easly affected by some bot&#8230;<br />
For example: if I need badly 64 bit I order to my bot to create 1000 surveys for 64 bit option.<br />
Or even better, I make 5000 votes for garbage collection <img src='http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Road with Nick by ra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/30/39330#comment-27013</link>
		<dc:creator>ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/30/39330#comment-27013</guid>
		<description>Umm... never mind, serial number problem was PEBKAC -- reviewing the serial number a dozen times alone didn't catch it but having someone else read it caught the type immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; never mind, serial number problem was PEBKAC &#8212; reviewing the serial number a dozen times alone didn&#8217;t catch it but having someone else read it caught the type immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Road with Nick by ra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/30/39330#comment-27012</link>
		<dc:creator>ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/30/39330#comment-27012</guid>
		<description>Any chance of having a roadshow at Huntsville, AL next spring? :)

BTW, I'm unable to redeem my BOGO coupon because I'm unable to register Rad Studio 2010 Ent. since last night. I keep getting "The serial number provided is not valid." error.  Both wizard and website fails.

If customers are unable to register because of a problem that can be reproduced by Embarcadero, will we be able to redeem the BOGO coupon after the deadline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of having a roadshow at Huntsville, AL next spring? <img src='http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m unable to redeem my BOGO coupon because I&#8217;m unable to register Rad Studio 2010 Ent. since last night. I keep getting "The serial number provided is not valid." error.  Both wizard and website fails.</p>
<p>If customers are unable to register because of a problem that can be reproduced by Embarcadero, will we be able to redeem the BOGO coupon after the deadline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What are you doing with Embarcadero Tools? by rufus.spb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/09/11/39309#comment-26998</link>
		<dc:creator>rufus.spb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/09/11/39309#comment-26998</guid>
		<description>Inspiration Library
www.beenokle.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspiration Library<br />
<a href="http://www.beenokle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.beenokle.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Road with Nick by Jim McKeeth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/30/39330#comment-26996</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McKeeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/30/39330#comment-26996</guid>
		<description>Have a great trip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a great trip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Delphi Survey by David Heffernan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-26994</link>
		<dc:creator>David Heffernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-26994</guid>
		<description>Some of you folk need to buck your ideas up.  The form wasn't that hard.  Anyway, you could always just ignore the bits that weren't relevant to you.  It took me around 15 minutes but that's well worth it.  As I see it you shouldn't complain about the product if you aren't prepared to spend the time to provide some useful feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you folk need to buck your ideas up.  The form wasn&#8217;t that hard.  Anyway, you could always just ignore the bits that weren&#8217;t relevant to you.  It took me around 15 minutes but that&#8217;s well worth it.  As I see it you shouldn&#8217;t complain about the product if you aren&#8217;t prepared to spend the time to provide some useful feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Delphi Survey by JanisT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-26992</link>
		<dc:creator>JanisT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/nickhodges/2009/10/26/39329#comment-26992</guid>
		<description>I finished this survey, and I feel, like I completed DOOM 3, took 2 hours to figure out all the errors and stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished this survey, and I feel, like I completed DOOM 3, took 2 hours to figure out all the errors and stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
